Creative Commons |
I did not want to acknowledge that, though. I wanted there
to be something better than the market leader and de facto standard. But my
latest experience in publishing my latest book has only reinforced that conclusion.
I used OpenOffice's word processor and then Pages to write the
book, which were fine when the goal was producing an e-book.
I found Pages especially useful in that I could use it on both my desktop Macintosh
and my iPad.
But when it came to formatting the book for print, well, using OpenOffice is downright aggravating, and Pages lacks some of the feature
essential to producing a professional grade printed book.
My reaction to Pages
Pages is a light and easy to use application. It only costs
$19.99 from the App store, and the iPad version is only ten bucks. On the other hand, Word
for the Mac can only be had as part of the Microsoft Office, which costs $139
for the Home version, or $99 per year for the Web-based subscription.
One of Pages' productive feature is the way that it automatically saves your new files and updates in iCloud. This made it simple to switch between using my desktop computer in my office and my iPad while mobile.
Pages’ user interface is characteristically clean and
inviting on the desktop computer. The iPad version, though, features a shade of
orange that I, personally, don’t like.
I reached the iPad version's limits quickly. It’s almost impossible
to format paragraphs using the ruler at the top of the screen. I don’t know if
my fingers are too thick and blunt or what, but the only way I could change
the paragraph indents was to enlarge the view to at least 200 percent, and
even then, it difficult to select the icons to move the margins.
Also, there doesn’t seem to be a
Styles feature in the iPad version, where I can set the typeface, font size,
paragraph spacing and other typographical features for blocks of text and
headlines and change them with one command. This is standard in full featured
word processors.
Finally, the major limitation on both the mobile and desktop
versions of Pages is the lack of a facing pages feature. It just doesn’t seem
to have entered the programmers’ minds.
What I need for print layout
Formatting an e-book is relatively simple compared to print output , because much
of the format of the e-book is determined by the e-reader device. Sure, you can
choose typeface and whether paragraphs are double-spaced or indented on the
first line. But when you go to print, there are many aspects beyond those that
you have to control.
When laying out a printed book, you have to consider the
page spread—two facing pages, left and right. If you look at a professionally
produced book, especially a textbook, you’ll see that the page layout elements
are mirrors of each other. For example, if the page number (“folio” in old book
layout parlance) is on top right corner of the right-hand page, it will be in
the left corner of the left-hand (even-numbered, if you do it right) page.
Word has a simple means of allowing this: you just check “Different
Odd & Even Pages” when formatting the Header or Footer.
What I like about Word
Word offers everything you could ask for in a word
processor: typing aids, a fully featured Styles menu, control over every aspect
of not just wording, character style and page layouts, but also output to .pdf
and e-pub format.
I can use Pages, but I have to use work-arounds. For
instance, if I want to save the document in a format (like .doc) so that a non-Mac user can share it, I can’t just Save As a .doc. Instead, I have to Export a
copy of the file. That means I now have two separate files, which leads to
version control problems.
Just use the .doc version from then on, you say? Easy enough
with Word, or most other programs. But the people at Apple have taken a bizarre
approach. It will open the files with the .doc filename extension, but convert
it on the spot to .pages format. Saving it in Word format requires saving it
first as a .pages document, then Exporting it again to Word format. It’s not a
big deal, but it is an extra step that gets annoying.
Word is a big, expensive program with more features than any
one person will ever use. But it does give me all the tools that I need for electronic
and print publishing. For that reason, it will have to remain my word
processing choice.
One of the sad things: Before the most recent version of Pages, it HAD most of those features you're griping about (and others that I'm guessing you didn't notice were missing, because they're equally gripe-worthy). When it first updated to the new version, it even lost internal hyperlinking ability, and Numbers lost custom cell formats.
ReplyDeleteI use Scrivener for formatting now, but when I have to choose between Pages and MS Word, MS Word tends to win, these days. Unfortunately. I miss the old Pages.
I use Pages and have absolutely loved it UNTIL they did a major overhaul. The latest version of Pages is terrible. The cut out about 100 features, several of them best suited for writers. I actually went back to using the old version, 09. I like the easy conversion to epub, and the old version has facing pages and all the other tools needed to format a book.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comparison!